I just love the title of this paper…
A job market paper for a PhD student (Jane Zhao) who was on the market a few years ago.
Quant Jocks and Tire Kickers: Does the Stock Selection Process Matter?
This paper classiﬁes mutual funds into two groups according to their distinctive stock selection approaches: tire kickers who rely on fund managers’ personal judgment and fundamental analysis to pick stocks, and quant jocks who use computer-based models to select stocks. I examine how the stock selection approach aﬀects mutual fund performance and economies of scale. I document an increasing trend of quantitative techniques used by mutual funds, and some unique characteristics of quant jocks. Quant jocks and tire kickers have similar factor-adjusted alphas, but quant jocks have higher Sharpe ratios. Quant jocks tend to be much smaller than tire kickers. I explore possible explanations for the size diﬀerence. I ﬁnd that although quant jocks can cheaply screen a large universe of stocks, the stocks that quant jocks invest in are smaller and less liquid, which results in higher transaction costs and limited scalability of quantitative investment strategies.
- The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
- Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
- This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.