Quantitative Value Research: Weighted P/E Bracket

/Quantitative Value Research: Weighted P/E Bracket

Quantitative Value Research: Weighted P/E Bracket

By | 2017-08-18T16:58:13+00:00 November 3rd, 2014|Research Insights, Value Investing Research|1 Comment

Decomposing the Price-Earning Ratio


The price-earnings ratio is a widely used measure of the expected performance of companies, and it has almost invariably been calculated as the ratio of the current share price to the previous year’s earnings. However, the P/E of a particular stock is partly determined by outside influences such as the year in which it is measured, the size of the company, and the sector in which the company operates. Examining all UK companies since 1975, we propose a modified price-earnings ratio that decomposes these influences. We then use a regression to weight the factors according to their power in predicting returns. The decomposed price-earnings ratio is able to double the gap in annual returns between the value and glamour deciles, and thus constitutes a useful tool for value fund managers and hedge funds.

Core Idea:

The paper decomposes P/E ratio into 4 factors, and then uses a regression to find the optimal weights of the factors according to their power in predicting returns:

  1. Time effects (average market P/E varies year by year);
  2. Sector effects (sectors grow at different rates over time);
  3. Size effects (positive relationship between a company’s market cap and the P/E);
  4. Idiosyncratic effects (e.g., insider buying/selling, analysts recommendations).

Alpha Highlight:

  • Using the optimum weightings doubles the average annual difference in returns between glamour and value deciles from 5.25% to 10.5%.
  • The new value portfolio constructed based on weighted P/E bracket outperforms the old by 2.4% annually.

The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.


An interesting idea, but anytime results are shown with “optimal” weights, we tend to proceed with caution, as the optimal weight today may not be the optimal weight tomorrow.

  • The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
  • Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
  • This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the Author:

After serving as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, Dr. Gray earned a PhD, and worked as a finance professor at Drexel University. Dr. Gray’s interest in bridging the research gap between academia and industry led him to found Alpha Architect, an asset management that delivers affordable active exposures for tax-sensitive investors. Dr. Gray has published four books and a number of academic articles. Wes is a regular contributor to multiple industry outlets, to include the following: Wall Street Journal, Forbes, ETF.com, and the CFA Institute. Dr. Gray earned an MBA and a PhD in finance from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a BS from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.

One Comment

  1. IlyaKipnis November 3, 2014 at 2:04 pm

    “Optimal weights”


    “Curve fit”

Leave A Comment