A Modification to the Flexible Asset Allocation Model
This topic is about Flexible Asset Allocation, a concept I first got wind of thanks to this blog.[ref] Ilya Kipnis is the author of QuantStrat [...]
This topic is about Flexible Asset Allocation, a concept I first got wind of thanks to this blog.[ref] Ilya Kipnis is the author of QuantStrat [...]
Robust asset allocation solutions should be relatively simple, minimize complexity, and be robust across different market regimes. Simultaneous to these requirements, the solution must be affordable, liquid, simple, tax-efficient, and transparent, otherwise, many of the benefits of the solution will flow to the croupiers and Uncle Sam. We recommend that investors explore our robust asset allocation framework and go for the do-it-yourself solution. You'll be paying yourself 1%+ a year via saved RIA fees. Is this the only solution? No. But any solution must be robust, simple, tax-manageable, and low-cost. This is our best effort to develop a simple model. Developing a complicated model is easy; simple is difficult.
Due to a surge of interest from our "Long Cheap; Short Expensive. Buyer Beware" post, we decided to analyze the impact of changing the net exposure of the Magic [...]
Jason Zweig's book, "Your Money and Your Brain" highlights an interesting conversation with Harry Markowitz. Dr. Markowitz is a Nobel Prize winner and his work [...]
Many of you have asked for the slides I presented at the ETF conference on tactical asset allocation. Note, the 2nd slide is an animation [...]
Simple and Effective Market Timing with Tactical Asset Allocation Lewis A. Glenn A version of the paper can be found here. Want a summary of [...]
Strategy Summary The flexible asset allocation strategy was first proposed by Keller and Putten (2012), in their paper "Generalized Momentum and Flexible Asset Allocation (FAA): An [...]
The blogosphere is spammed with commentary related to the current high market valuations and the inevitable crash that "must" ensue. We've even been involved in [...]
In this post we explore the trade-off between diversification and alpha generation. Here is a high level summary of the situation: Owning more stocks in a portfolio lowers "idiosyncratic" risk, or risk that can be eliminated through diversification...however...Owning more stocks dilutes performance of an "alpha" generating process. (e.g., forcing Warren Buffett to hold a 500 stock equal-weighted portfolio would dampen his alpha). In summary, fewer stocks in a portfolio imply more expected alpha and more idiosyncratic risk; more stocks in a portfolio imply less expected alpha and less idiosyncratic risk. But what is the optimal trade-off between alpha and idiosyncratic risk? Do we want to own a 1 stock portfolio? A 50 stock portfolio? A 1000 stock portfolio?
Exploiting Factor Autocorrelation to Improve Risk Adjusted Returns K Oversby A version of the paper can be found here. Want a summary of academic papers with [...]
In our last post, we looked at tactical allocation using valuation metrics and trend-following measures. Our conclusion from the analysis is that discerning robust trading [...]
Simple Technical Trading Rules and the Stochastic Properties of Stock Returns Brock, Lakonishok, and LeBaron A version of the paper can be found here. Want a [...]
Strategy Background Beta Rotation strategy (BRS) is discussed by Charles Bilello and Michael Gayed in their new paper, “An International Approach to Beta Rotation: The [...]
The mention of technical analysis in the halls of academia can cause serious angst. The disdain for technical analysis likely stems from a firm belief that [...]
Mean Reversion, Momentum and Return Predictability Huang, Jiang, Tu, Zhou A version of the paper can be found here. Want a summary of academic papers with [...]
Investors are enamored with various investment houses and personalities who claim insight into the prospects for long-term expected market returns. Some classic examples include Nouriel Roubini, John Hussman, David Rosenberg, or Jeremy Grantham. All really smart people. But have you ever asked "How" these folks came to their conclusions? In most cases, the answer is probably "No" and the reason is because there is a lack of transparency from the author(s) and/or a lack of knowledge/understanding on behalf of the reader. We also want to highlight that one can develop incredibly complex return forecasting models -- super sexy, super interesting, super compelling, etc. -- but that still doesn't mean they are any good at forecasting much of anything.
We know that valuation metrics such as the CAPE, or Shiller P/E, ratio are correlated with long-term returns (notice we didn't say "predict" long-term returns--that is [...]
Inter-Temporal Risk Parity: A Constant Volatility Framework for Equities and Other Asset Classes R Perchet, R Carvalho T Heckel and P Moulin A version of [...]
John Bogle did a tremendous service to humanity when he launched the first index fund in 1975. By providing people with a passive, low-cost way [...]
Financial news TV shows are a great place to wage philosophical battles, particularly with respect to investing, which tends to gets people’s juices flowing. Warren [...]
© Copyright 2010-2026 Alpha Architect | All Rights Reserved | Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Disclosures | Subscribe | Contact Us
