Quantitative Momentum Research: Price and Earnings Momentum

/Quantitative Momentum Research: Price and Earnings Momentum

Quantitative Momentum Research: Price and Earnings Momentum

By | 2017-08-18T16:58:24+00:00 February 3rd, 2015|Research Insights, Momentum Investing Research|2 Comments

Momentum Strategies


We examine whether the predictability of future returns from past returns is due to the market’s underreaction to information, in particular to past earnings news. Past return and past earnings surprise each predict large drifts in future returns after controlling for the other. Market risk, size, and book-to-market effects do not explain the drifts. There is little evidence of subsequent reversals in the returns of stocks with high price and earnings momentum. Security analysts’ earnings forecasts also respond sluggishly to past news, especially in the case of stocks with the worst past performance. The results suggest a market that responds only gradually to new information.

Alpha Highlight:

In 1993, Jegadeesh and Titman observed that a stock’s past return has marginal predictive power for its future return, which is widely known as “momentum.” In this paper, Chan, Jegadeesh and Lakonishok (1996) further show that momentum may be explained by market’s underreaction to earning-related information as well. So the authors try to disentangle the sources of momentum premia based on these two separate factors: past return and earnings surprise.

Paper first evaluates two momentum strategies:

  1. Price Momentum: formed based on the past 6-month returns;
  2. Earning Momentum: formed based on past earnings surprises.*

*Earnings surprise is measured three ways: standardized unexpected earnings, abnormal returns around announcements of earnings, and revisions in analysts’ forecasts of earnings.

Key Findings:

First, they find out that both momentum strategies are profitable and they are not subsumed by each other. Specifically, when past large, positive returns are not validated by positive earnings surprises, the price will then encounter a stronger correction in the future.

In other words, when both prices and earnings are moving in the same direction, the momentum premiums will be the highest.

So, both past return and earnings surprise have predictive power for the post-formation drifts in returns.

The Table below shows the results of a cross-sectional regressions of returns: the coefficient on past return is 5.7%. When introducing past earnings surprises, the coefficient decreases to 2.9%, but is still significant.

2015-01-06 10_46_49-Chan, Jegadeesh and Lakonishok_1996.pdf - Adobe Reader

The results are hypothetical results and are NOT an indicator of future results and do NOT represent returns that any investor actually attained. Indexes are unmanaged, do not reflect management or trading fees, and one cannot invest directly in an index. Additional information regarding the construction of these results is available upon request.

Then the authors study the overlap between price and earnings momentum. They find that price momentum effect tends to concentrate around earnings announcements. About 41% of the price momentum premium in the first six months occurs around announcement dates of earnings.

The Paper hypothesizes that these two momentum strategies draw upon the market’s underreaction to different pieces of information.

Earnings momentum benefits from short-term underreaction to short-term earnings. Price momentum benefits from underreaction to a broader information set, including profitability.

  • The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
  • Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
  • This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the Author:

Jack Vogel
Jack Vogel, Ph.D., conducts research in empirical asset pricing and behavioral finance, and is a co-author of DIY FINANCIAL ADVISOR: A Simple Solution to Build and Protect Your Wealth. His dissertation investigates how behavioral biases affect the value anomaly. His academic background includes experience as an instructor and research assistant at Drexel University in both the Finance and Mathematics departments, as well as a Finance instructor at Villanova University. Dr. Vogel is currently a Managing Member of Alpha Architect, LLC, an SEC-Registered Investment Advisor, where he heads the research department and serves as the Chief Financial Officer. He has a PhD in Finance and a MS in Mathematics from Drexel University, and graduated summa cum laude with a BS in Mathematics and Education from The University of Scranton.
  • Andrew M.

    How do these factors relate to the trend in profitability (post yesterday)? Is one of them subsumed by the other or are all three additive?

  • Jack Vogel, PhD

    From “The Trend in Firm Profitability and the Cross Section of Stock Returns” paper:

    “In particular, the trend effect remains after controlling for size, book-to-market,
    medium term past returns, long term past returns, return volatility, volatility of profitability, earnings momentum, turnover, liquidity, asset growth, accruals, distress risk, firm strength, R&D expenditures, persistence or streaks in earnings, and alternative measures of profitability.”

    So the trend in firm profitability exists after controlling for momentum (medium term past returns) and earnings momentum. However, we cannot say that the trend in firm profitability subsumes momentum or earnings momentum.

    Good empirical question for someone to test!