Academic Research Insight: The Strategic Timing of Earnings News

//, Academic Research Insight/Academic Research Insight: The Strategic Timing of Earnings News

Academic Research Insight: The Strategic Timing of Earnings News

By | 2017-08-18T17:10:59+00:00 June 19th, 2017|Basilico, Academic Research Insight|0 Comments
  • Publication: JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ECONOMICS,  2016 (version here)

What are the research questions?

  1. Do managers act to strategically time negative earnings announcements?
  2. Is there a strategic weekday (Monday through Friday) and/or time of day (either before trading hours, during trading hours or after trading hours) that is optimal for the release of negative earnings news?

What are the Academic Insights?

  1. YES- There is evidence that firms have an incentive to time “bad news” and the effort to strategically time the release of negative news about earnings is effective in reducing the immediate market impact on the firm’s share price.
  2. YES- The worst news about earnings is announced on Friday evenings and occurs later in the evening than other days and times, including Fridays and other evenings. These late Friday announcements are also followed by the highest possible negative drifts as the market fails to fully incorporate the news immediately into prices.
  3. Associated with and following the Friday evening announcements these behaviors and firm characteristics are observed: (1) Firms have a lower frequency of holding conference calls; (2) a higher frequency of major restructuring events occur; (3) more insider trading: (4) more delisting or merger events; (5) smaller size and higher book/market ratios; (6) lower institutional ownership; and (7) a smaller analyst following.

Why does it matter?

The size and significance of the post-earnings announcement drift, suggest that managers utilize Friday evening announcements to avoid market and investor scrutiny.

The differences in firm characteristics noted for Friday announcers suggest that these firms have a relatively low presence of corporate governance and more information asymmetry.

The Most Important Chart From the Paper:

Tommi Johnsen, Ph.D., (@TommiJohnsen) is an independent investment consultant. With co-author Elisabetta Basilico, PhD, CFA  she is writing an upcoming book on research backed investing. You can learn more at

  • The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
  • Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
  • This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the Author:

Tommi Johnsen, PhD
Dr. Tommi Johnsen, until retirement in 2017, was the Director of the Reiman School of Finance and a tenured faculty at the Daniels College of Business at the University of Denver.She has worked extensively as a consultant and investment advisor in the areas of quantitative methods and portfolio construction. She taught at the graduate and undergraduate level and published research in several areas including: capital markets, portfolio management and performance analysis, financial applications of econemetrics and the analysis of equity securities. Her publications have appeared in numerous peer-reviewed journals.

Leave A Comment