Factor Investing

Applied Quantitative Value (Part 4 of 4)

I sat down with Wes Gray--who also contributes frequently on this blog under the title Wesley Gray, Ph.D.--and Toby Carlisle--who runs the great blog over [...]

Risk Premia Harvesting Through Momentum

Risk Premia Harvesting Through Momentum Gary Antonacci A version of the paper can be found here. Abstract: "Momentum is the premier market anomaly. It is [...]

Quantitative Value vs. Magic Formula Stocks

Here is a quick screen comparison between our Quantitative Value (described here) and the Magic Formula (screen results from here): click to enlarge click to enlarge [...]

Calculating Value Portfolios–Why Details Matter

The Devil in HML's Details Cliff Asness and Andrea Frazzni http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2054749 Key Points: Using a more real-time estimate for book-to-market (B/M) matters. Alphas from using [...]

Do Cash-Adjusted P/E Ratios Work?

A guest speaker in my lecture last week mentioned something interesting: Apple looks like a growth stock on a P/E basis, but when you strip [...]

Predicting anomaly returns with politics, weather, global warming, sunspots, and the stars

Ferson, Sarkissian and Simin (2003) warn that persistence in expected returns generates spurious regression bias in predictive regressions of stock returns, even though stock returns are themselves only weakly auto correlated. Despite this fact a growing literature attempts to explain the performance of stock market anomalies with highly persistent investor sentiment. The data suggest, however, that the potential misspecification bias may be large. Predictive regressions of real returns on simulated regressors are too likely to reject the null of independence, and it is far too easy to find real variables that have “significant power” predicting returns. Standard OLS predictive regressions find that the party of the U.S. President, cold weather in Manhattan, global warming, the El Nino phenomenon, atmospheric pressure in the Arctic, the conjunctions of the planets, and sunspots, all have “significant power” predicting the performance of anomalies. These issues appear particularly acute for anomalies prominent in the sentiment literature, including those formed on the basis of size, distress, asset growth, investment, profitability, and idiosyncratic volatility. 

Valueinvestorsclub.com Performance Update

If you are unfamiliar with Valueinvestorsclub.com and you call yourself a "value investor," you've been missing out on the greatest value communities of all time. [...]

Are stock pickers better than Computers?

Empiritrage has a detailed research piece on the question of whether or not quantitative value can beat fundamental stock-pickers. http://empiritrage.com/2012/03/24/man-vs-machine-quantitative-value-or-fundamental-value/ Here are a few highlights: [...]

Magic score: Long-Term vs. Short-Term

Security Analysis, by Graham and Dodd, is a classic text on value investing. We love it. And despite our outward "quant" appearance, everything thing we [...]

Risk-Managed Momentum

Last week we discussed the possibility that "momentum is finished." Astute readers of the blog generally agreed with the concept, but also pointed out that [...]

Momentum Finished?

CXO Advisory highlights an interesting paper with the tagline: "Momentum Not Working?" Here's the link: http://www.cxoadvisory.com/subscription-options/?wlfrom=%2F17440%2Fmomentum-investing%2Fmomentum-not-working%2F Here is the link to the source: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1951137 This [...]

Shorting the Magic Formula

I just got back from the Value Investing Congress--http://www.valueinvestingcongress.com/. The event was exceptional and very thought-provoking. While Einhorn's annihilation of Green Mountain Coffee was impressive [...]

Go to Top