Independent Women: Investing in British Railways, 1870-1922
- Graeme G. Acheson; Gareth Campbell; Áine Gallagher and John D. Turner
- Economic History Review, 2020
- A version of this paper can be found here
- Want to read our summaries of academic finance papers? Check out our Academic Research Insight category
What are the Research Questions
When we think of the investing community of the late 19th Century and early 20th Century, our minds might immediately think of characters such as Rich Uncle Pennybags(1). It turns out that Uncle Pennybags should be joined, if not replaced, by “Rich Aunt Stuffed-Pockets”. Scholars have documented the rise of women investing during the nineteenth century but this paper focuses on answering two important questions about the development of female investors:
- How did this phenomenon progress into the twentieth-century?
- Whether women shareholders over a century ago behaved differently from their male counterparts?
What are the Academic Insights?
By analyzing the shareholder constituencies of railways(2), which were the largest public companies at the time and a popular investment among the middle class, the authors find:
Why does it matter?
These findings provide evidence that women shareholders were acting independently by choosing to take on the sole risks and rewards of share ownership when making their investments as a single shareholder as opposed to sharing the risks and rewards via a joint shareholding. The conclusions of this paper paints a more nuanced picture of how we should think about female investors in the past.
The Most Important Chart from the Paper:
The early twentieth century saw the British capital market reach a state of maturity before any of its global counterparts. This coincided with more women participating directly in the stock market. In this paper, we analyze whether these female shareholders chose to invest independently of men. Using a novel dataset of almost 500,000 shareholders in some of the largest British railways, we find that women were much more likely to be solo shareholders than men. There is also evidence that they prioritized their independence above other considerations such as where they invested or how diversified they could be.