We highlighted a few weeks ago that Smart Beta is More Expensive Than You Think.
Smart Beta and other closet-indexers are everywhere, but what happened to old-fashioned high-conviction active management in the mid/large cap space? Last I checked the market isn’t totally efficient and people are still not 100% rational. It seems that there should be some opportunities for those who are prepared to demonstrate some conviction. So who are these intrepid souls?
- ETF: Our samples of ETFs are from ETF database. We sort our samples by categories, “U.S. Equity, Large-cap, mid-cap, value, growth, and blend”. After excluding “fund of funds” and missing data, our sample include 124 ETFs.
- Mutual Fund: Samples of Mutual funds are from Morningstar Premium Fund Screener. We use the same sorting options as the ETFs and we get 6,133 samples (missing data excluded).
Focused ETF funds (with stock holdings <=50) only accounts for 8% of the funds in the universe. This percentage is consistent with the finding in the article “SEC Denies Precidian Active ETF Request.”
- On average, most ETFs are lower-cost index trackers, and not actively managed.
There is a higher percentage of mutual funds that are focused (about 23%) compared with ETFs. The average expensive ratio of focused mutual funds is 128 bps. The more “active” the fund–the higher the cost–on average.
There seems to be a lack of focused ETFs, but a glut of expensive focused mutual funds. When will we see active ETFs finally take off? Maybe never?
- The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
- Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
- This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.