Rebalancing: Less is More?

/Rebalancing: Less is More?

Rebalancing: Less is More?

By | 2017-08-18T16:58:04+00:00 February 3rd, 2014|Uncategorized|7 Comments

We did a quick study on monthly vs. annual rebalancing for the IVY5 asset allocation portfolio.

We did buy and hold and moving average rule variations.

Result: little difference between monthly and annual return rebalances.



Buy and hold weights don’t differ that much from monthly equal-weight rebalanced weights


Click to Enlarge

Let’s recite: activity does not equal value. 

Again: activity does not equal value.

And one last time: activity does not equal value.

Okay, I still disagree with that statement because my system 1 refuses to believe it, but whatever…

  • The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Alpha Architect, its affiliates or its employees. Our full disclosures are available here. Definitions of common statistics used in our analysis are available here (towards the bottom).
  • Join thousands of other readers and subscribe to our blog.
  • This site provides NO information on our value ETFs or our momentum ETFs. Please refer to this site.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

About the Author:

After serving as a Captain in the United States Marine Corps, Dr. Gray earned a PhD, and worked as a finance professor at Drexel University. Dr. Gray’s interest in bridging the research gap between academia and industry led him to found Alpha Architect, an asset management that delivers affordable active exposures for tax-sensitive investors. Dr. Gray has published four books and a number of academic articles. Wes is a regular contributor to multiple industry outlets, to include the following: Wall Street Journal, Forbes,, and the CFA Institute. Dr. Gray earned an MBA and a PhD in finance from the University of Chicago and graduated magna cum laude with a BS from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.


  1. Francisco February 8, 2014 at 5:55 pm

    One question regarding the study: when you calculate the 1,12 MA safety rule with annual rebalancing, do you mean you only check whether the index is under its 12 month moving average once a year (in January, perhaps)?

    Or you exit and entry every month as needed with the same money left from the previous buy/sell and rebalance the total amount at the end of the year?

    • Wes Gray February 11, 2014 at 8:17 pm

      Your second notion: monthly MA check, but an annual rebalance of the underlying positions.

  2. S February 9, 2014 at 8:19 pm

    Have you all looked at the impact of which month the annual rebalance occurs in, generally or for QV? In the latest edition of What Works on Wall Street the author introduces a composite annual rebalance that averages the returns of having started in all 12 months. The effects are profound, not sure how meaningful they are though. Thoughts?

    • Wes Gray February 11, 2014 at 8:16 pm

      Yes, we have looked at nearly all possibilities at this point. Stock prices are incredibly volatile, as are stock portfolios. There can be a lot of variance across formation periods. I haven’t seen the updated version of WWOWS, but I imagine the figures are merely capturing this aspect of stock prices. Can you share some of the stats you’re seeing? CAGRs can drift 100-300bps across a lot of strategies…sometimes more…

Leave A Comment